Avances en el trabajo de equipos multidisciplinares para la atención al paciente con asma grave no controlada. Una visión post-COVID (Proyecto TEAM 2.0) / Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project)

El asma es una enfermedad respiratoria crónica con un alto impacto sanitario, social y económico, en particular, en el caso del asma grave no controlada (AGNC). Por ello, son especialmente necesarias nuevas estrategias para mejorar su abordaje, con un enfoque personalizado a cada paciente y desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar, además de integrar las nuevas prácticas de telemedicina y telefarmacia impulsadas a raíz de la pandemia de COVID-19. En este contexto se ha desarrollado el proyecto TEAM 2.0 («Trabajo en Equipos de Asma Multidisciplinares»), continuación del proyecto TEAM llevado a cabo en 2019, con el objetivo de actualizar y priorizar buenas prácticas de trabajo multidisciplinar en AGNC en un contexto post pandemia y analizar los avances conseguidos. Un grupo coordinador, constituido por 8 equipos multidisciplinares de farmacéuticos hospitalarios, neumólogos y alergólogos, llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica actualizada, puesta en común de buenas prácticas multidisciplinares y análisis de avances. A través de 5 reuniones regionales con otros expertos con experiencia en AGNC, se compartieron las buenas prácticas identificadas y fueron sometidas a debate, evaluación y priorización. En total, 23 buenas prácticas de trabajo multidisciplinar en AGNC, agrupadas en 5 ámbitos de trabajo: 1) organización del trabajo en equipos multidisciplinares, 2) educación al paciente, autoadministración y adherencia, 3) resultados en salud, seguimiento de datos y persistencia, 4) telefarmacia y experiencias implantadas durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y 5) formación e investigación, fueron evaluadas y priorizadas por 57 profesionales del ámbito de la farmacia hospitalaria, la neumología, la alergología y la enfermería. Este trabajo ha permitido actualizar la hoja de ruta de acciones prioritarias, para seguir avanzando en modelos óptimos de atención al paciente con AGNC en un contexto post-COVID-19. (AU)

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project (“Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams”) has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context. (AU)

[Translated article] Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project).

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.

Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project). / Avances en el trabajo de equipos multidisciplinares para la atención al paciente con asma grave no controlada. Una visión post-COVID (Proyecto TEAM 2.0).

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.

Effectiveness of Switching to Benralizumab in Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.

Purpose: Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the α subunit of the IL-5 receptor. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this agent with respect to lung function and symptom control in patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of benralizumab after switching previous treatment with other monoclonal antibodies. Patients and Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study under conditions of daily clinical practice. The study population comprised consecutively included patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma whose initial treatment with omalizumab or mepolizumab was switched to benralizumab. Patients were evaluated at 4 and 12 months after starting treatment with benralizumab. We analyzed asthma control, number of severe exacerbations, corticosteroid cycles, visits to the emergency department, and hospital admissions, as well as lung function. Similarly, we evaluated the response to treatment according to previously established criteria. Results: We evaluated 40 patients who switched from omalizumab (n=16) or mepolizumab (n=24) to benralizumab. The reasons for switching were lack of response in 30 cases, adverse effects in 9, and patient request in 1. Switching was followed by a significant decrease in the number of exacerbations, visits to the emergency department, and corticosteroid cycles, as well as improved ACT both at 4 and 12 months. However, no significant improvement in lung function was observed. Asthma control (including complete response and control) was achieved in 55% of patients (n=22) at 12 months. Specifically, a complete response was achieved in 30% of patients at 12 months (66.7% switching from omalizumab and 33.3% from mepolizumab). Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma who experience a partial response with omalizumab or mepolizumab could benefit from switching to benralizumab. This approach can reduce the number of exacerbations, visits to the emergency department, and corticosteroid cycles and improve control of asthma.

Síndrome posneumonectomía en paciente con síndrome de Swyer-James-MacLeod / Postpneumonectomy Syndrome in a Patient With Swyer-James-MacLeod Syndrome

No disponible

[Translated article] Postpneumonectomy Syndrome in a Patient With Swyer–James–MacLeod Syndrome / Síndrome posneumonectomía en paciente con síndrome de Swyer-James-MacLeod

No disponible

Influence of climatic variables on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient attendance to a pulmonary rehabilitation program.

PURPOSE: Implementing adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs is key to obtaining the best results. The objective of our study was to evaluate the influence of weather conditions (humidity, temperature, and precipitation) on attendance to a PR program in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. METHODS: This prospective observational study, carried out in Seville (Spain), included COPD patients who participated in a 36-session outpatient mixed (strength and endurance) training program for 12 weeks. The program included educational sessions as well. The attendance at the program scheduled sessions during 1 year was evaluated in relation to the meteorological conditions of relative humidity in percentage (%), temperature in degree centigrade (°C), and precipitation in millimeters (mm) according to the data from the State Meteorological Agency (AEMET) and the meteorological center of La Rinconada. RESULTS: A total of 81 COPD patients who underwent 2903 sessions were analyzed. The annual average attendance of the program was 78.6%. No differences were found in the attendance to the program depending on the climatic conditions evaluated throughout the year. CONCLUSIONS: In a specific geographical area such as Seville, meteorological conditions are not a determining factor of attendance to the PR program for COPD patients.

¿Mienten los pacientes con EPOC sobre su hábito tabáquico? / Do COPD patients lie about their smoking habit?

OBJETIVO: Determinar la tasa de decepción o concordancia entre la respuesta de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) sobre su hábito tabáquico y la medición del mismo por cooximetría en una consulta monográfica EPOC. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional prospectivo para determinar la concordancia entre los valores de cooximetría y la respuesta a entrevista clínica sobre hábito tabáquico. EMPLAZAMIENTO: Consulta monográfica de EPOC, Neumología, Sevilla. PARTICIPANTES: Pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de EPOC en cualquier grado. INTERVENCIONES: Entrevista clínica y medición de monóxido de carbono mediante cooximetría. MEDICIONES PRINCIPALES: Valores de cooximetría, respuestas sobre hábito tabáquico, variables sociodemográficas. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó un total de 169 pacientes (n: 169) de los cuales, 107 presentaron valores menores o iguales 6 ppm frente a 62 con valores mayores a 6 ppm, determinando una prevalencia de tabaquismo activo del 36,7%. La tasa de decepción fue del 19,5% del total de la muestra (24,3% de entre todos los que afirmaban no fumar), con una kappa de Cohen de 0,48 y p < 0,000. El 40% de los pacientes confesó no haber dicho la verdad. No se encontró ninguna relación de este dato con la edad, el consumo acumulado de tabaco ni el FEV1. Se halló una relación significativa con el sexo (tasa de decepción: 31,8% en las mujeres vs. 15,2% en los hombres, p 0,017). CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de nuestros intentos para que los pacientes dejen de fumar, la tasa de decepción en nuestra consulta fue considerable, mayor entre las mujeres, exfumadores recientes o en proceso de abandono, por lo que sería fundamental incorporar medidas objetivas como el cooxímetro en el abordaje de este tipo de pacientes

OBJECTIVE: To determine the deception rate or concordance between the interview on smoking and cooximetry in COPD patients from a monographic consultation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study to evaluate the concordance between the values of cooximetry and the response to a clinical interview on smoking. SETTING: COPD monographic consultation, Pneumology, Seville. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD in any degree. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical interview and measurement of carbon monoxide by cooximetry. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Cooximetry values, responses on smoking, sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: n: 169. 107 patients presented values less than or equal to 6 ppm compared to 62 with values greater than 6 ppm, determining a prevalence of active smoking of 36.7%. The deception rate was 19.5% of the total sample (24.3% of all those who claimed not to smoke), with a Cohen kappa of 0.48 and p < 0.000. 40% of patients confessed not having told the truth. No relationship of this data was found with age, accumulated tobacco consumption or FEV1. A significant relationship with sex was found (deception rate: 31.8% in women vs. 15.2% in men, p 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of our attempts to make patients stop smoking, a considerable deception rate was found in our consultation; higher among women, recent ex-smokers or in the process of abandonment, so it would be essential to incorporate objective measures such as the cooximeter in the approach of this type of patient

Fístula traqueoesofágica secundaria a ventilación mecánica prolongada / Tracheoesophageal Fistula due to Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

No disponible

[Do COPD patients lie about their smoking habit?] / ¿Mienten los pacientes con EPOC sobre su hábito tabáquico?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the deception rate or concordance between the interview on smoking and cooximetry in COPD patients from a monographic consultation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study to evaluate the concordance between the values of cooximetry and the response to a clinical interview on smoking. SETTING: COPD monographic consultation, Pneumology, Seville. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD in any degree. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical interview and measurement of carbon monoxide by cooximetry. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Cooximetry values, responses on smoking, sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: n: 169. 107 patients presented values less than or equal to 6 ppm compared to 62 with values greater than 6 ppm, determining a prevalence of active smoking of 36.7%. The deception rate was 19.5% of the total sample (24.3% of all those who claimed not to smoke), with a Cohen kappa of 0.48 and p < 0.000. 40% of patients confessed not having told the truth. No relationship of this data was found with age, accumulated tobacco consumption or FEV1. A significant relationship with sex was found (deception rate: 31.8% in women vs. 15.2% in men, p 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of our attempts to make patients stop smoking, a considerable deception rate was found in our consultation; higher among women, recent ex-smokers or in the process of abandonment, so it would be essential to incorporate objective measures such as the cooximeter in the approach of this type of patient.

Fibrosis quística del adulto, una causa de bronquiectasias a considerar en el paciente con EPOC / Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Possible Cause of Bronchiectasis in COPD Patients

No disponible

Actinomicosis sobre cuerpo extraño inorgánico endobronquial / Endobronchial actinomycosis associated with an inorganic foreign body

No disponible

Parotiditis en una paciente con ventilación mecánica no invasiva / Parotiditis in a patient with non-invasive mechanical ventilation

No disponible

Regresión espontánea de una bulla enfisematosa pulmonar / Spontaneous Regression of Pulmonary Emphysematous Bulla

No disponible